OBJECTIVE: To determine body image disturbance and relationship satisfaction between obese and non-obese ple consisted of 100 participants. Data was collected through purposive sampling technique from different gyms and nutrient-clinics of Johar Town, Faisal Town and Model Town of Lahore city. Educated females having minimum education level of intermediate belonging to upper and middle-class families were recruited. The shortened form of Body Shape Questionnaire and Relationship Assessment Scale were administered, in addition to collecting demographic information through a semi structure performa. Independent sample t-test and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation was used in the analysis of the data, using SPSS v.21.RESULTS: Most of obese and non-obese married women (n=) were in the age range of 25-35 years and 30-40 years respectively with mean age of 34 years for obese and 33 years for non-obese married women. Husband’s mean age for obese and non-obese was 39 years and 38 years respectively. Almost all the non-obese (n=) while most of the obese (n=) married women were having education level of 16 or more while almost all the non-obese (n=) were working women and most (n=) of the obese were house wives. Thirty-two () non-obese were having 2-6 years while (n=) obese married women were having 7-9 years of marriage duration. A significant relationship was shown at the level of body image disturbance (p<0.000) and marital satisfaction (p<0.000) between obese and non-obese married women.CONCLUSION: Obesity has significant impact on body image and relationship satisfaction in married women.
Post Info
- ACM
- ACS
- APA
- ABNT
- Chicago
- Harvard
- IEEE
- MLA
- Turabian
People are allowed and you can motivated to article what they do on the web (age.g., inside organization repositories otherwise on their website) ahead of and from inside the submission processes, that you can trigger productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher ticket out-of had written performs.
Sources
Community Wellness Team. Obesity and you will overweight 2016. National Institute away from Diabetic issues and you will Digestive and you can Kidney Diseases. Fat and you will carrying excess fat statistics [Internet] 2012. Burkhauser Rv, Cawley J. Past Body mass index: the worth of even more appropriate strategies from fatness and you will obesity inside the social technology search. J Wellness Econ 2008;27(2):519-31. DOI: /j. Crowther New jersey, Norris SA. The modern waist width reduce point employed for the latest diagnosis out of metabolic syndrome in sub-Saharan African female is not compatible. PLoS One to 2012;7(11):e48883. DOI: /journal. Goswami S, Sachdeva S, Sachdeva Roentgen. Muscles photo pleasure one of people youngsters. Ind Psychiatry J 2012;21(2):168-72. DOI: -53. Ng Meters, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. International, local, and you will federal frequency regarding heavy and you may obesity in children and grownups during the 1980-2013: a clinical investigation into the Worldwide Burden off Problem Investigation 2013.
New Lancet 2014 Will get 30;384(9945):766-81. DOI: /S0140-6736(14)60460-8. Jernigan In the morning, Tergas AI, Satin AJ, Fader A keen. Being obese government inside gynecologic malignant tumors survivors: seller techniques and you may thinking. Are J Obstet Gynecol 20. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fische EB. Environmental models of fitness decisions. Inside Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Fitness Decisions and you will Fitness Training: Idea, Look, and exercise. JOSSEY-Bass, a beneficial wiley imprint. John Wiley & Sons, Bay area, U . s .. Bandura A. rencontres pour travestis pour gratuit A personal cognitive principle of personality. Into the Pervin L, John O, editors. Manual regarding personality. Guilford Publications, Ny, Usa. Sarwer DB, Lavery Meters, Spitzer JC. A glance at the relationship ranging from significant carrying excess fat, lifestyle, and you will sexual setting. Obes Surg 2012 Annual percentage rate;22(4):668-76. DOI: /s1step 1695-0step 12-0588-step one. Paeratakul S, Light MA, Williamson Da, Ryan DH, Bray GA.
Intercourse, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic reputation, and you will Body mass index about self?impact away from over weight. Obes Res 20. McNulty JK, Neff La, Karney BR. Past 1st appeal: physical attractiveness from inside the newlywed Feb;22(1):135-43. DOI: -. Arcelus J, Yates An effective, Whiteley R. Romantic dating, medical and sandwich-systematic dining conditions: A look at the new literary works. Gender Loved ones Ther 20. Stokes Roentgen. Frederick-Recascino C. Ladies’ recognized human body photo relationships which have individual pleasure. J Female Ageing 2003;15(1):17-30. DOI:/J074v15n01_03. Zawawi JA. Relationship anywhere between Bmi, Muscles Image Disappointment and you can Emotional Distress among Fitness center People Profiles for the Zarqa-Jordan. Int J Hum Soc Sci 2014;4(1):11-20. Evans C, Dolan B. Figure survey: Derivation away from reduced “choice models”. Int J Consume Disord 1993;13(3):315-21. DOI: -108X(199304)13:step 3 step 3. CO;2-3. Points A good, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura Letter, Taylor HL.
Indicator off relative weight and carrying excess fat. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(3):655-65. DOI: /ije/dyu058. Hendrick SS. A common measure of dating fulfillment. J 1988;50(1):93-8. DOI:31. AL-Otaibi HH, Naseef SL, Raouf TA. Muscles visualize frustration, weight status and you can exercise certainly one of a sample from university students for the Saudi Arabia. Dining Nutr Sci 2013;4(6):616-twenty five. DOI:/fns. Seligman MEP. Self-confident health. Appl Psychol 2008;57(1):3-18. DOI: /j. Yamamiya Y, Cash TF, Melnyk SE, Posavac, Hd, Posavac SS. Ladies’ experience of slim-and-beautiful news images: Looks picture outcomes of media-better internalization and effect-reduction treatments. Looks Photo 2004;2(1):74-80. DOI:/j. Lovell GP, Gordon JA, Mueller MB, Mulgrew K, Sharman R. Satisfaction out of Basic Emotional Demands, Self-Determined Exercise Determination, and you may Emotional Better-Being in Parents Working out in-group-Centered Rather than Individual-Based Contexts. Healthcare Ladies Int 2016;37(5):568-82. DOI:333. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Ebneter D, Huntsman JA.
Being obese discrimination: the new part away from physical appearance, individual ideology, and you may anti-fat bias. Int J Obes (Lond) 20. Give PG, Boersma H. And then make feeling of are pounds: A great hermeneutic studies from adults’ factors to own carrying excess fat. Couns Psychother Res 2005;5(3):212-20. DOI: 1690500310429. Choo J, Jeon S, Lee J. Sex differences in wellness-related quality of life regarding the abdominal being obese inside the a great Korean inhabitants. BMJ Unlock 20-003954. Bolton MA, Lobben We, Harsh TA. The brand new perception away from system picture for the diligent worry. Prim Care Mate J Clin Psychiatry 2010;12(2):722-34. DOI: /PCC. Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. System photo and you will marital satisfaction: proof into mediating part of intimate regularity and you may sexual satisfaction. J Fam Psychol 2011 April step 1;24(2):156-64. DOI: /a001906. Pujols Y, Close BN, Meston CM. The latest connection anywhere between sexual satisfaction and the entire body picture in women.
J Intercourse Med 2010;7(2 Pt dos):905-16. DOI:/j. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam Age, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, et al. Communities, carrying excess fat, and you may diabetes–an excellent randomized societal check out. Letter Eng J Med 2011 Oct 20;365(16):1509-19. DOI: /NEJMsa1103216. Williams K. Has the way forward for ination out-of intercourse, matrimony, and you will emotional better-becoming. J Wellness Soc Behav 2014 Can get twelve;44(4):470-87.