through the make-it-go-away dept
Final thirty days, I first find out about popular Jewish dating site JDate suing a Jewish Tinder clone JSwipe via a write-up by Greg Ferenstein explaining the outline associated with lawsuit — though, unfortunately suggesting that the lawsuit it self had been genuine. I obtained a duplicate of this issue and now have been meaning to publish up a far more step-by-step analysis for the lawsuit, however in recent days, the Observer got lots of attention for speaking about the patent facet of the lawsuit and Vice’s Motherboard published a write-up explaining the way the patent under consideration is ridiculous. Really, it really is even worse than that. The entire lawsuit is ridiculous, also it begins aided by the trademark claims that come before the patent people.
In the trademark front side, JDate makes the argument it, even though its actual trademarks are on specific things like JDate and JMag that it has trademarked any dating site/app with the letter “J” in front of.
Plaintiff is the master of a diverse trademark profile associated with its different services and products, including a big group of markings utilising the “J” prefix to indicate services and products (“J-family”) built to meet up with the needs for the community that is jewish.
[. ] Plainiff has expended significant time, work, cost, ability, research and development during the period of over 17 years to build up, advertise, market, and promote its iconic J-Family of marks, all originating with its earliest mark, the progenitor for the J-Family of Marks: JDATE.
Unless of course there isn’t any confusion that is public this, it really is tough to observe how there is the best trademark instance, nor will there be any practical chance that “JSwipe” somehow “dilutes” the trademark of JDate. This simply appears like sour grapes by JDate for maybe not recognizing the way the marketplace for online dating services had been going quickly towards the Tinder-esque “swiping” model. The whole trademark argument from JDate moms and dad Spark Networks, is concentrated on “JDATE” itself, without ever realistically explaining why or exactly just how that mark should connect with JSwipe, that will be certainly not comparable to JDate apart from you start with a J. And therefore “J” does not indicate “JDATE” so much because it shows “Jewish.”
Ferenstein’s article submits at the least anecdotal proof that folks are not confusing JSwipe with JDate or assuming they are in any way linked:
it simply therefore occurred that during the exact same Summit gathering where I came across Yarus, we additionally discovered a great Jewish couple that met on Jswipe. “I happened to be surprised to know this, given that it appears unbelievable if you ask me. We never ever once thought that there is any affiliation between Jswipe and Jdate,” said the the female regarding the few, who was simply unacquainted with the lawsuit.
I’ve already been a longtime jswipe user, and I also never ever thought the software had been linked to Jdate.
From the theoretical appropriate viewpoint, “This isn’t a detailed situation. It’s obviously invalid beneath the Alice standard,” Mr. Nazer stated. “It’s disappointing that legal counsel would file this instance.”
Putting aside the usage of some type of computer, this might be no new procedure at all. It’s nothing more than a service that is dating asks people whom they like and matches up the shared interests. It’s the ads that are classified. It’s speed dating. It is virtually the premise of You’ve Got Mail (which will be centered on a 1937 play, predating https://datingmentor.org/escort/cincinnati/ JDate’s patent by years).
In reality, it goes back far beyond even all those. a magazine article from 1799 described a “new and imperial that is original royal plan” found in “all the polished courts through the entire understood world!” Relating to this course of action:
Every person, of either sex, who would like to come right into a treaty of wedding, is first to subscribe a specific sum. All women and gentlemen to spell it out by themselves, by genuine or fictitious names, themselves…The subscribers to be furnished with a list of descriptions, and when one occurs likely to suit, to signify the individual would be glad to correspond with the number in question, &c.; and, if mutually approved, the interview may be afterwards arranged as they may choose; and give a detail of.
This is often like JDate’s patent, even down seriously to an individual IDs.
Even yet in Ferenstein’s article — which bizarrely claims that JDate has a patent that is legitimate (it generally does not) — he quotes an attorney stating that the patent is “way too broad,” though, bizarrely, instantly discounts this by noting it was awarded in 1999, suggesting that it is ok due to that. It could be real that the USPTO ended up being granting plenty of bad patents in 1999 (it was!), but that does not replace the undeniable fact that this patent is practically undoubtedly invalid.
The Observer article further records so it seems at the very least several other internet dating sites have actually certified this patent (including dating internet site giant IAC), however, many other people have never, nor have they been approached. Alternatively, it would appear that JSwipe may mostly have been targeted because JDate wished to purchase the site and JSwipe wasn’t interested — since noted within the Ferenstein article:
. sources near the scenario inform me that Jdate low-balled a purchase offer that couldn’t also purchase a high-priced bat mitzvah celebration, so Jswipe fought the lawsuit rather than offer.
“From a Judaic ethics standpoint this lawsuit is improper,” argues Rabbi Shlomo Yaffe, Dean for the Institute of United states and Talmudic Law, regarding competition between Jdate, Jswipe, along with other Jewish online dating sites. Jewish legislation, he informs the Ferenstein Wire, allows unlimited competition for solutions important to the extension for the faith.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. These days, we really appreciate you giving us your time with so many things competing for everyone’s attention. We strive every to put quality content out there for our community day.
Techdirt is just one of the few staying undoubtedly independent news outlets. We don’t have a huge firm behind us, so we count greatly on our community to aid us, in a day and age whenever advertisers are increasingly tired of sponsoring little, independent websites — specially a niche site like ours this is certainly reluctant to pull punches with its reporting and analysis.
While other internet sites have actually resorted to paywalls, enrollment demands, and advertising that is increasingly annoying/intrusive we now have constantly held Techdirt open and accessible to anybody. However in order to keep performing this, we are in need of your support. We provide many different means for our visitors to support us, from direct contributions to unique subscriptions and merchandise that is cool and every small bit assists. Many thanks.